![]() ![]() (ENG) ECHR - COURTALKS-DISCOURS TERRORISM (ENGLISH VERSION) HUDOC database: (eng) echr - courtalks-discours asylum (english version) Final remarks on asylum and the ECHR - 23:17 Interim measures under Rule 39 - 21:29ġ1. Asylum procedure and effective remedies - 17:43ĩ. Conditions of reception of asylum seekers - 13:08Ĩ. Diplomatic assurances and internal relocation - 09:33Ħ. Barriers to removal of asylum seekers - 02:35Ĥ. Key notions on asylum and the ECHR - 0:18Ģ. Handbook on European law relating to asylum, borders and immigration: ġ. The video was produced by the Court in cooperation with, and with the support of, the Council of Europe’s Programme “Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals” (HELP ). It is principally aimed at legal professionals and civil society organisations. It provides an overview of the Court’s jurisprudence in matters related to asylum. This video offers a twenty-five-minute talk by a lawyer from the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights () and was recorded in the Court’s main hearing room. (ENG) ECHR - THE CORRECT WAY TO LODGE AN APPLICATION WITH THE COURT (ENGLISH VERSION) (eng) echr - video on the admissibility conditions (english version) The Court is keen to encourage any initiatives aimed at making use of the video in awareness-raising programmes on human rights or in civic education courses. The video on admissibility is intended to remind members of the public wishing to apply to the Court that they must first satisfy certain criteria, failing which their application may be declared inadmissible. ![]() In 2011, for instance, the Court finished examining over 50,000 applications, but fewer than 3% of them resulted in a judgment being adopted. ![]() The video, which is approximately three minutes long, is aimed at the general public and sets out the main conditions required in order to apply to the Court failure to satisfy these conditions is the reason why the vast majority of applications are rejected. The European Court of Human Rights launched a short video on the criteria for admissibility, produced with the support of the Principality of Monaco. (ENG) ECHR - VIDEO ON THE ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS (ENGLISH VERSION)Įuropean Court of Human Rights - Video on Admissibility Conditions (ENG) ECHR - COURTALKS-DISCOURS, ADMISSIBILITY OF AN APPLICATION (ENGLISH VERSION) HUDOC database: (eng) echr - courtalks-discours, admissibility of an application (english version) Download realita cinta rock n roll lk21 free#Music: Lino Rise - Channel Intro Belgium Royalty Free / Creative Commons Licence © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rightsĭisclaimer: The contents of this video do not bind the Court. ![]() Manifestly ill-founded (Article 35 § 3 de la Convention) - 12:50 No significant disadvantage (Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention) - 11:22ġ1. Subject-matter of the case (Ratione materiae) (Article 35 § 3 of the Convention) - 10:18ġ0. Temporal jurisdiction (Ratione temporis) (Article 35 § 3 of the Convention) - 09:17ĩ. Territorial jurisdiction (Ratione loci) (Article 35 § 3 of the Convention) - 08:41Ĩ. State liability (Ratione personae)( Article 35 § 3 of the Convention) - 07:29ħ. Victim status (Article 34 of the Convention) - 05:58Ħ. Application already submitted to the Court or another international body (Article 35 § 2 of the Convention) - 05:30ĥ. Abuse of the right of application (Article 35 § 3 of the Convention) - 04:37Ĥ. Exhaustion of domestic remedies and six-month time-limit (Article 35 § 1 of the Convention) - 02:18ģ. Application form and Rule 47 of the Rules of Court - 0:44Ģ. The video was produced by the Court in cooperation with, and with the support of, the Council of Europe’s Programme “Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals” (HELP ).ġ. It explains the admissibility criteria that each application must fulfill in order to be examined further by the Court and is principally aimed at legal professionals and civil society organisations. This video offers a fifteen-minute talk by a lawyer from the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights () and was recorded in the Court’s main hearing room. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |